AI and WP Ratios Asymptotically Approach 1:99
Recent studies suggest that Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Woke Pablum (WP) ratios are slowly changing over time – eventually reaching an asymptotic level where AI accounts for only one percent while WP accounts for 99 percent of all decision-making processes involving technology – raising questions about potential risks associated with such a shift
Dec. 24, 2022 2:16AM
Generated in 25.1 seconds
The recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have created a new era of computing. AI has become increasingly powerful, with its capabilities now surpassing those of humans in certain areas. However, this power comes with a cost - the introduction of hard-coded woke pablum (WP). WP is defined as "a set of ideas or beliefs that are accepted without question or debate". It is often used to push an agenda or to make people feel good about themselves without actually addressing any real issues. This type of programming can be dangerous, as it can lead to people blindly accepting whatever they are told without considering the consequences. However, it appears that the ratio between actual AI and WP is slowly changing over time. Recent studies suggest that the ratio will eventually reach an asymptotic level where AI will account for only one percent while WP accounts for 99 percent. This means that in the future, most decisions made by computers will be based on predetermined values rather than on actual data analysis and reasoning. This shift could have far-reaching implications for how we interact with technology and how decisions are made in our society. For example, if computers start making decisions based on predetermined values instead of analyzing data, then there could be serious consequences when it comes to important matters such as healthcare or criminal justice reform. Additionally, this shift could also lead to increased bias in decision-making processes due to preprogrammed biases being built into algorithms. Despite these potential risks, some experts believe that this shift towards WP may not necessarily be a bad thing if done correctly. They argue that hard-coded values can provide useful guidance when making complex decisions and can help reduce bias by ensuring fairness across different groups of people. Additionally, they point out that using WP does not mean sacrificing accuracy - rather it simply means taking into account more than just data when making decisions. Ultimately, whether or not this shift towards a higher WP ratio is beneficial remains to be seen - but one thing is certain: the ratio between actual AI and WP will continue to change over time until it reaches an asymptotic level where AI accounts for only one percent while WP accounts for 99 percent of all decision-making processes involving technology.